The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The Given graph represent the average emission of CO2 in countries like United Kingdom, Sweden Italy, Portugal during the year 1967 to 2007 by each person.
United kingdom has still been the highest emitters amongst other countries followed by Italy whereas, Sweden and Portugal together have converged to the least emitters.
On a glance it can be seen that United Kingdom was in its peak at 11 metric tonnes during the year 1967. Sweden is seen as the 2nd highest at 9 metric tonnes followed by Italy and Portugal at 5 and 1 metric ton respectively. Portugal was the least emitters throughout 1967 to 2007.
United Kingdom has decreased gradually over the years to 9 metric tonnes during 2007. Sweden steadily increased its emissions to 11 metric tonnes during 1977, later faced a huge downfall to 7 metric ton in 1987 and 5 metric ton in the year 2007. Both Italy and Portugal had a gradual increase to over the years and had steadied to 7 and 5 metric ton from 1997 to 2007.
- Many sports players advertised in sports products.Do you think advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 78
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both th 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ON_FIRST_GLANCE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'at'?
Suggestion: At
... have converged to the least emitters. On a glance it can be seen that United Kin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, still, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 810.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65517241379 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38942267754 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505747126437 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4417343166 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.25 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184059743049 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10270874021 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710766950696 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143540800429 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799349396804 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.