The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007
(the graph in the picture given down below)
The line graph illustrates the amount of carbon dioxide emanation in 4 different countries during a forty year period.
It is clear that carbon dioxide emitting from UK was the highest over the period shown. Overall, the figures of italy and portugal witnessed moderate increases, while those of UK and Sweden decreased insignificantly.
In 1967, there was approximately 10 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide emanating from UK, followed by those of Sweden and Italy, with roughly 8% and 4%. In contrast, the carbon dioxide emitting from Portugal was significant low, at about 1%.
In 2002, an minimal reduce in the carbon dioxide exhaust can be witnessed, compared to a climb in the figure of Italy, from about 6% to 8%. Moreover, those of Sweden hit a peak and then plummeted, while there was a steady increase in Portugal carbon dioxide emission. It seems that those of Sweden and Portugal are at the same proportion ( at roughly 6%)
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-15 | promen9x1999 | 50 | view |
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second paragraph shows the green house gas emission which result from this energy use 84
- The line graph illustrates the fish and meat consumption in gram per person per week in a European country between 1979 and 2004 88
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007(the graph in the picture given down below) 50
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...al was significant low, at about 1%. In 2002, an minimal reduce in the carbon d...
^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...gnificant low, at about 1%. In 2002, an minimal reduce in the carbon dioxide ex...
^^
Line 7, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and Portugal are at the same proportion at roughly 6%
^^
Line 7, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re at the same proportion at roughly 6%
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 784.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99363057325 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71533376323 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573248407643 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.7907545067 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182829763939 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876282797759 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0242526948485 0.0843802449381 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119591858026 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00878764357571 0.0819641961636 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.