The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph compares the average amount of carbon dioxide emission per person in four different countries( The United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal) from 1967 to 2007. Units are measured in metric tones.
Overall, the average producer of carbon dioxide was the highest in UK whereas, Portugal produced the least carbon dioxide. Average carbon dioxide emission in UK and Sweden declined over the period while in Italy and Portugal it increased.

At the beginning of the period in United Kingdom about 11 Metric tonnes of Carbon dioxide were emitted and it showed marginal decrease of about 0.1 In 1977. After that the figure kept on decreasing steadily till it reached around 9 metric tonnes at the end of the period. Similarly carbon dioxide emission in Sweden decrease with some fluctuations.in 1967 approximately 9 metric tonnes of CO 2 was produced and it reached a peak of more than 10 metric tonnes in 1977.The emission showed dramatic decrease to 7 metric tonnes in 1987 and kept on decreasing till it reached around 5.5 in 2007.

Italy’s emission accounted for around more than 4 metric tonnes and it kept on increasing dramatically till it outnumbered Sweden in 1987. The emission increased to more than 6 metric tonnes in 1997 and it remained constant till 2007. In addition Portugal produced more than 1 metric tonnes in 1967 and the figure kept on increasing rapidly to about 4.5 metric tonnes in 1997.After 1997 the change was little till 2007 and it outran Sweden

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 158, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...marginal decrease of about 0.1 In 1977. After that the figure kept on decreasing stea...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 273, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...metric tonnes at the end of the period. Similarly carbon dioxide emission in Sweden decre...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 468, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...k of more than 10 metric tonnes in 1977.The emission showed dramatic decrease to 7 ...
^^^
Line 6, column 244, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
... and it remained constant till 2007. In addition Portugal produced more than 1 metric to...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 382, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: After
...idly to about 4.5 metric tonnes in 1997.After 1997 the change was little till 2007 an...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, whereas, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1250.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58396284803 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 380.7 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.6229013654 43.030603864 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223858213819 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119697633607 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10151083002 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189589981012 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105381921236 0.0819641961636 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.