The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The line graph unveils the statistics of a country namely, United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal on secretion of carbon-dioxide by each individual in the duration of forty year.
In general, the emission of carbon-dioxide is found to be following similar pattern in Italy and Portugal which had increasing trend with countable fluctuation. In Contrast United Kingdom and Sweden had downfall in which the former has steady decline and the latter one reached to its highest, at once during the first decade and fell down in similar manner for the next ten years and later it had gradual declination.
In the initial year, 1967 discharge of carbon-dioxide in Italy was slightly above than four metric ton which in the next ten year reached to above six metric ton and in the year 1997 the data reached near to eight and leveled off since. Similarly, in Portugal the emission was at its minimum around one metric ton and in the next 20 years it showed steady increment after which the statistics had drastic raise for some time ahead of next decade (1997) and it stabilized.
In contrary, Sweden after a drastic increment had its highest peak of the first ten year in 1997, reaching to above ten metric ton which then fell vividly till 1987 reaching the point of around seven metric tons, and for the rest of the time it followed steady declination reaching to the record of six metric tons. Regarding United Kingdom, the statistic had steady downfall for the entire period.
- The charts below show the main reasons for the study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 73
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 73
- Some believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 73
- The Chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010. 67
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Contrast,
...ng trend with countable fluctuation. In Contrast United Kingdom and Sweden had downfall ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...d later it had gradual declination. In the initial year, 1967 discharge of car...
^^
Line 5, column 471, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of next decade 1997 and it stabilized. In contrary, Sweden after a drastic incr...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 400, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... steady downfall for the entire period.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, regarding, similarly, so, then, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1232.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86956521739 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53377873592 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490118577075 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 373.5 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.7514537922 43.030603864 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 176.0 112.824112599 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.1428571429 22.9334400587 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111970550292 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071278951423 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562432272895 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0928014717546 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574116570697 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.2329268293 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.4 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.3012195122 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.