the graph below shows the average carbon dioxide emissions per person between 1967 to 2000
The graph illustrates the average output of carbon dioxide in metric tonnes for each individual in four European countries over a forty year period from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, the United Kingdom and Sweden, which initially showed a high C02 output, saw a decline in emissions throughout the period. Conversely, Italy and Portugal, which started with relatively low emissions, witnessed big increases by the end of the period.
In 1967 the UK had the highest amount of carbon emissions at 11 metric tonnes per person, however, throughout the whole period there was a steady decline in C02 output ending at around 9 metric tonnes for each individual. Swedens output started at around 9 metric tonnes, rose to a peak of around 11 tonnes in 1977, then saw a sharp decline to approximately half of that by 2007.
In contrast, Portugal in 1967 had the lowest output at just over 1 tonne per person. Over the next 40 years, this increased sharply, ending at over 5 metric tonnes. Italy demonstrated a similar pattern, beginning at 4 metric tonnes and ending at nearly 8 tonnes of CO2 for each person by 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-15 | annatran12324 | 78 | view |
- the chart below gives information about Southland s main exports in 200 2019 and future 2025 92
- Research indicates that the characteristics we are born with have much more influence on our personality and development than any experiences we may have in our life. Which do you consider to be the major influence? 61
- Cinema attendance by age group 73
- the graph below shows the average carbon dioxide emissions per person between 1967 to 2000 78
- Economic progress is often used to measure a country's success. However, some people believe that other factors are more important. What other factors should also be considered when measuring a country's success? Do you think one factor is more 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, so, then, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85263157895 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60725601611 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557894736842 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8748177839 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154401297363 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738620146013 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718103378199 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103298387994 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522029396514 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.