The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given chart illustrate the fluctuation of the personal carbon dioxide release on average in four selected European countries during the time span of forty years beginning at 1967.

Throughout the whole forty years' period, United Kingdom ranked the first place in the emissions,plunging from 11metric tonnes at its climax in the first ten years to around 9 metric tonnes, though it present a continous downward trend in the following years . Whereas Sweden climbed dramticaly from under 9 metric tonnes to nearly 10.5 metric tonnes ranging in a quarter of the total times , sinking directly to more than 5.5 metric tonnes in 2007.

Simutanuously ,Italy showed drastically growth in this section ,which finally caught up the level of Sweden in 1989 with nearly 7 meric tonnes, soaring from about 4.4 metric tonnes to the number closing to 5 metric tonnes in three decades starting at 1967 and stablizing in the rest times . So did the performance of portugal , which followed the same tendency that grew from approximately 1.5 metric tonnes to roughly 5.5 metric tonnes in 75% of the times and remained unchanged to 2007 , coinciding the amount emitted by Sweden at the same year.

To sum up , both UK and Sweden took ten years to axe the emission of carbon dioxide and their goals finally realised in 1977, while there was a marked increase in the release of above gas in either Italy or Portugal until in 1997, when the relating number eventually reflected a stable tendency.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , plunging
... ranked the first place in the emissions,plunging from 11metric tonnes at its climax in t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'presents'?
Suggestion: presents
...rs to around 9 metric tonnes, though it present a continous downward trend in the follo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...us downward trend in the following years . Whereas Sweden climbed dramticaly fro...
^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the following years . Whereas Sweden climbed dramticaly from under 9 metric ...
^^
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ollowing years . Whereas Sweden climbed dramticaly from under 9 metric tonnes to...
^^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... ranging in a quarter of the total times , sinking directly to more than 5.5 metri...
^^
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...metric tonnes in 2007. Simutanuously ,Italy showed drastically growth in this...
^^
Line 5, column 28, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in 2007. Simutanuously ,Italy showed drastically growth in this section ,whic...
^^
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...owed drastically growth in this section ,which finally caught up the level of Swe...
^^
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eden in 1989 with nearly 7 meric tonnes, soaring from about 4.4 metric tonnes to ...
^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...at 1967 and stablizing in the rest times . So did the performance of portugal , wh...
^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...mes . So did the performance of portugal , which followed the same tendency that g...
^^
Line 5, column 459, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly 5.5 metric tonnes in 75% of the times and remained unchanged to 2007 , coinc...
^^
Line 5, column 464, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...5 metric tonnes in 75% of the times and remained unchanged to 2007 , coinciding...
^^
Line 5, column 487, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of the times and remained unchanged to 2007 , coinciding the amount emitted by ...
^^
Line 5, column 493, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... times and remained unchanged to 2007 , coinciding the amount emitted by Sweden...
^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...by Sweden at the same year. To sum up , both UK and Sweden took ten years to ax...
^^
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ission of carbon dioxide and their goals finally realised in 1977, while there wa...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, so, whereas, while, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98790322581 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61002243753 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 106.607317073 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608870967742 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 22.4926829268 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.8283764298 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 206.166666667 112.824112599 183% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.3333333333 22.9334400587 180% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 18.0 1.69756097561 1060% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133836319544 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731907750558 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411428462016 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0929087600354 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380752367255 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.7 13.2329268293 172% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.32 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.3012195122 176% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.55 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.9970731707 167% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.