The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The line chart gives information about the amount of carbon dioxide emissions per head in four particular nations from 1967 to 2007.
In general, the emissions of carbon dioxide in the UK and Sweden had an upward trend, while Italy and Portugal were the opposite patterns. The UK had a reduction but still accounted for the highest average of CO2.
The average of carbon dioxide released in Italy doubled in Portugal in 1967. Approximately seven metric tonnes of CO2 were produced by an Italian citizen, in comparison to each Portuguese discharged over 5 tonnes during the next 30 years.
There were 11 metric tonnes of CO2 released by a British habitant, compared with 9 tonnes in Sweden at the beginning of the period. After reaching 10.5 tonnes, the quantity of CO2 in Sweden dramatically decreased and had the same pattern as Portugal in 2007. Despite a gradual decline in carbon decline emissions from 11 metric tonnes in 1967 to 9 metric tonnes in 2007, the United Kingdom was the biggest emitter of carbon dioxide as compared to all other countries.
- The illustration shows information about how an igloo is built from snow Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries shops and on public transport To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 78
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, still, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88888888889 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59298674253 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544444444444 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5855577761 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316425365546 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149026916586 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116097709203 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18951265589 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02170613174 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.