The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates how average monthly in prices of three metals: Copper, Nickel and Zinc changed in 2014.
Overall, the share of Nickel remarkably dropped, the proportion of Cooper had a similar change, but to lesser extent. On the other hand, the percentage of the Zinc was rise marginally.
The share of Nickel started at 6% in January, then declined dramatically to 1% in March, followed by another rapid decrease to -3% in the middle of the year. Similarly, it can be seen a steady downward of the Cooper's proportion, from 2% in January to -0.5 in June. Conversely, in the first month of the year there was a gradual growth of Zinc's the percentage, from 1% to 3%, after which was a declined fluctuation, then arrived at the lowest point of -1% during the year.
After hit a trough in June, all the proportion of Nickel, Zinc and Copper were rose slightly to around -1 (Nickel and Zinc) and 1% (Cooper), followed by a stable remain onward September. During the three months final, the percentage of Nickel and Zinc increased negligibly to 1% and 2% while the share of Cooper reached 1.5% at the final.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-03-22 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
2024-03-22 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
2024-02-29 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
2024-02-29 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
2024-01-25 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... metals: Copper, Nickel and Zinc changed in 2014. Overall, the share of Nickel r...
^^
Line 4, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...June, all the proportion of Nickel, Zinc and Copper were rose slightly to around ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, similarly, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65306122449 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59322235178 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566326530612 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7258703832 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0967708266376 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507978934411 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894581250218 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0876857469661 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108857343621 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.