The line graph illustrates the consumption of fish and three different kind of meat by the citizens of a European country from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, it can be seen that, the consumption of beef and decreased during the period. Furthermore, the consumption of chicken rose dramatically during the years and for fish the figures were stable.
To begin with, fish consumption was stable during the period around 50 grams per person per week. In the case of beef, just above 200 grams were consumed by a person per week in 1979, however after 1984, this consumption decreased rapidly and by 2004, it reached approximately around 100 grams.
Secondly, in 1979, just below 150 grams of chicken was consumed by a person., while for lamb, this was at 150 grams. After 1979, the consumption of chicken increased rapidly, whereas the consumption of lamb declined dramatically. By the end of the period the consumption of chicken rose to reach a peak of almost 250 grams per person a week, while for lamb the figures decreased to around 70 grams.
- In the present era children are found to have fewer responsibilities than it used to be in the past time Some people consider it as positive development however some other people believe it to be a negative trend 73
- The table below gives information about the percentage Of workforce employed in six industries in Australia between 1989 and 2009 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 77
- The graph shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- since traveling abroad became relatively inexpensive more countries opened their doors for foreign tourists is it a positive or negative trend give your opinion and include relevant examples 87
- In the present era children are found to have fewer responsibilities than it used to be in the past time Some people consider it as positive development however some other people believe it to be a negative trend Discuss both the views and give your 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88202247191 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70339156782 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505617977528 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9067955418 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.625 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 5.23603664747 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177376845492 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948011394075 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0941217542777 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141348616853 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111500019134 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.77 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.