The graph shows the differences of consumption in fish and some kinds of meat in a European country over a period of 25 years.
In 1979, it is clear that beef was by far the most meat eat by European in this country, consumed around 220 grams per person. The consumption of chicken and lamb shows a similar level, marginally over 150 grams and slightly under 150 grams in 1979, respectively. But just few years later, the figure of chicken overtook the figure of lamb and the gap was increased further in the rest period. The consumption of fish was the smallest one, around 60 grams per person.
In spite of some fluctuation, the consumption of chicken saw a dramatic rise to about 250 grams per person in 2004. By contrast, the figure of beef dipped rapidly from about 240 grams in 1983 to only 100 grams in 2004, after rose almost 20 grams in the previous 4 years. A similar down trend was indicated for lamb, showing a decrease of about 90 grams from1979 to 2004. While the figure of fish fell to approximately 50 grams in 1983 and remained at this level for the rest years.
Overall, chicken and beef were the more favorite meat in the European country, and the consumption of lamb and fish shown a fewer level.
- Some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community. They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- The picture below show the differences in the layout of conference centre between its present and its future plan Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 53
- In some countries governments pay the money for students’ university fees，while in other countries, students pay for themselves. Do advantages of governments paying for the students outweigh its disadvantages？ 67
- The table below shows the numbers of people in each age group working in certain sectors in the UK in 1998 and 2006 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52252252252 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45250311484 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495495495495 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.4345515465 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.4 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172168484888 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854202062882 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805840861444 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147850452383 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916177672822 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.