The graph below shows the consumption of.fish and some different kinds o f meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates changes in the amounts of eef, lamb, chicken and fish consumed in a particular European country between 1979 an 2004.
In 1979 beef was by far the most popular of these foods, with aoout
225 grams consumed per person per week. Lamb and chicken were eaten in similar quantities (around 150 grams), while much less fish was consumed Gust over 50 g ams).
However, during this 25-year period the consumption of beef and lamb fell dramatically to approximately 100 grams and 55 grams respectively. The consumption of fish also declined, but much less significantly to just below 50 grams, so althougl:l it remained the least popular food, consumption levels were the most stable.
The const~mption of chicken, on the other hand, showed an upward trend, overtaking that of lamb in 1980 and that of beef in 1989. By 2004 it had soared to almost 250 grams per person per week.
Overall, the graph shows how the consumption of chicken increased
dramatically while the poRularity of these other foods decreased over the ·period.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds o f meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 89
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Whatsortofpunishmentshouldparents andteacher 61
- Thepie chartbelowshowsthemainreasonswhyagriculturallandbecomes lessproductive Thetableshowshowthesecausesaffectedthreeregionsof theworldduringthe 1990s Summarisetheinformationbyselectingandreportingthemainfeatures and make comparisonswhere relevant 11
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organisation Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun fish is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...quantities around 150 grams, while much less fish was consumed Gust over 50 g ams. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72016806203 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594285714286 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3254930357 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.375 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 3.83414634146 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145018770068 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662240848497 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641086967127 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.076430022406 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722523993247 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.