The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given line graph compares the amount of fish and other kind of meat consumed by a person every week in a European country from 1979 to 2004.

It is noticeable that the consumption of chicken meat rose dramatically for 25 years. On the other hand, the amount of beef that consumed by a people every week decreased significantly on this periods.

Looking at more details, beef is the most favored meat to consume in 1979, with above 200 grams per person per week. It reached its peak in between 1979 and 1984 by almost 250 grams of meat. Then, it gradually decreased and touched just around 120 grams in 2004.

However, the chicken meat is the third preference of the people's choice who want to consume meat in 1979. It below the beef and lamb, respectively, but above the fish with almost 150 grams of chicken consumption per week. It rose gradually and touch about 250 grams in 2004. The lamb, on the other hand, decreased to slightly above 50 grams in 2004. Meanwhile, the consumption of meat is steady around 50 grams per week per person for two and a half decades.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-24 pateldhruv1708 67 view
2019-12-22 Lovepreet123 67 view
2019-12-15 KIM JINUK 56 view
2019-12-15 KIM JINUK 56 view
2019-11-09 anasrafiq 73 view
Essays by user rawarontek :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e every week decreased significantly on this periods. Looking at more details, be...
^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'then', 'third', 'while', 'kind of', 'on the other hand']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.24200913242 0.268076937826 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.0913242009132 0.116061578633 79% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0502283105023 0.0759168565197 66% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0639269406393 0.0366838410393 174% => OK
Pronouns: 0.027397260274 0.0131127313244 209% => OK
Prepositions: 0.187214611872 0.155750635184 120% => OK
Participles: 0.027397260274 0.0379272487307 72% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.4706212991 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0182648401826 0.0210936926555 87% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0958904109589 0.0948980150116 101% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00456621004566 0.00967000014798 47% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1083.0 1161.00487805 93% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.9 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5824742268 5.90752243213 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73763899035 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.247422680412 0.337110787985 73% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.180412371134 0.247514529752 73% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.123711340206 0.171178102325 72% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0773195876289 0.112407865282 69% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4706212991 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484536082474 0.546246751206 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 40.8767536099 49.3433353143 83% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 8.93414634146 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.6363636364 23.0094962315 77% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.084097939 42.9750493124 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4545454545 135.714022679 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6363636364 23.0094962315 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.909090909091 0.689975730869 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.48048780488 68% => OK
Readability: 35.6776007498 47.7609492067 75% => OK
Elegance: 2.5 2.94281807926 85% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.453918391807 0.418131533498 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.11437852928 0.181151798455 63% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0363124601968 0.0850326197045 43% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.616860186951 0.706616315825 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.157678425305 0.157042692854 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217084352004 0.228904883108 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925231420752 0.108899403657 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.32355475542 0.367819155151 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.149657436343 0.0812612215331 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.329936304695 0.316326947829 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0957894644563 0.0921553760075 104% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70731707317 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.08536585366 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.16585365854 190% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.02926829268 165% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 7.1512195122 154% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.