The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph presents an overall view of how much a European country spent on fish and some different types of meat from 1979 to 2004.
In general, we can see immediately the sharp contrast between the soaring chicken and the falling of beef, lamb and fish.
On the whole, the consumption of fish was clearly the least popular and it remained almost stable at about 50 grams despite a short and slow drop over the period.
Looking at the graph, compared with fish, lamb and beef; the chicken was the most popular consumption in a European country. In other words, the consumption of chicken increased rapidly about from 140 grams to 250 grams, a surprising advance of about 100 grams between 1979 and 2004.
As for beef and lamb, although they both had a downward trend. Previously people in this country have consumed these foods a lot compared to the latter. In addition, what was mentioning is that beef used to be the most common meat with about 220 grams in 1979 and lamb was followed by beef with 150 grams in the same year. To give more details, beef experienced more drastic changes than lamb, but it remained the second position in consumption with around 125 grams and followed by lamb with approximately 70 grams in 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-11 | trangh16688 | 73 | view |
- It is generally accepted that smoking causes the deaths of large number of people In order to address this problem governments should bans smoking in public places To what extend do you agree or disagree 79
- The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U.S. from 1960 to 2011. 56
- Social media such as Facebook, Twitter is replacing facr-to-face contact in people's lives. DO you think the advatages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 55
- The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U S from 1960 to 2011 63
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, second, so, as for, in addition, in general, in other words, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66055045872 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38992146363 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56880733945 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2044159481 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.888888889 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.77777777778 5.23603664747 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133672268477 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648340729247 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719880870234 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946994072145 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0810599344036 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.