The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in
a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant.
the line graph describes how much fish and meat was weekly consumed by a European country from 1979 to 2004
overall, while the figure for chicken increased significantly, the consumption of other given food items showed an opposite pattern. also, fish remained to be the least favored kind of protein source over the recorded period.
Turning to the details, about 220 grams of beef were eaten per week, which was also the highest number shown in 1979.Fish, however, accounted for nearly one-fourth of that amount, with just over 50 grams. Regarding the two remaining categories ( chicken and lamb), the weekly consumption was more or less 150 grams.
Until 2004, there was a downward trend in beef consumption, with a drop of around 100 grams. the same pattern can be seen in lamb sector, with an approximately 90-gram decrease. By contrast, people tended to eat more chicken, whose figure rose to a high of about 260 grams in the eventual year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the line graph describes how much fish and ...
^^^
Line 2, column 134, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
... food items showed an opposite pattern. also, fish remained to be the least favored ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Fish
...s also the highest number shown in 1979.Fish, however, accounted for nearly one-four...
^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Regarding the two remaining categories chicken and lamb, the weekly consumption...
^^
Line 4, column 93, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ption, with a drop of around 100 grams. the same pattern can be seen in lamb sector...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, regarding, so, while, kind of, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 788.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.925 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54211403167 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.70625 0.547539520022 129% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7888485818 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.571428571 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125956999544 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518605475944 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063858262361 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942383524654 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821424765294 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.