The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in
a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates that people in a Europe country consume the amount of four different foods and how these changes from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, fish was the least commonly used food in the Europe country over the period of 30 years. While beef and lamp decreased, chicken experienced a fluctuating increase.
In 1979, the amount of beef which was consumed, was the highest, at about 220 grams per person per week. The expenditure of lamp and chicken was lower than beef, at exactly 150 grams and under 150 grams, respectively. Finally, fish was lowest, at above 50 grams.
In comparision to with the consumption of chicken, which witnessed a fluctuating increase to exactly 250 grams, the amount of fish remained from the 1979- 2004 period. Finally, the expenditure of lamp and beef declined to above 50 grams and 100 grams, respectively.
- Many students have to study subjects which they do not like. Some peoplethink this is a complete waste of time. Do you agree or disagree with thisstatement? 84
- The Internet will never replace traditional course books in schools How far do you agree with this prediction 94
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan andMalaysia in the year 2010 61
- Advertisement Writing Task 2 An increasing number of advertisements on TV aim at children What are the effects of television advertising Should television advertising be controlled 88
- The chart shows the division of household tasks by gender in Great Britain 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 712.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 143.0 196.424390244 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97902097902 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45807182446 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67050476072 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566433566434 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 199.8 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4821698181 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100273040448 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466922121073 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504658905842 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0740871345237 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442650366998 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.