The diagram shows how much different kinds of meat and fish was consumed in a country in
Europe from 1979 to 2004. Overall, although beef was the most popular type of meat at first, it
was replaced by chicken towards the end of the survey. In contrast, fish remained the least
significant throughout the period.
In the first year, beef was the most popular with a consumption of about 225 grams per person
per week. Then, this figure experienced a sudden plunge of 50 before surging to about 230 in
1984. Following this, there were some fluctuations until 1989, after which it decreased
dramatically to around half as high as its original level in 2004.
The figure for lamb was initially almost as high as that for chicken (around 150 grams per person
per week). However, while the former declined gradually and significantly as it reached
approximately 60 in the last year, the latter saw a considerable growth and outstripped beef
consumption in 1989, peaking at 250 in 2004.
Fish consumption was originally approximately 60 and experienced a small fall of about 10 over
the period.
- The graph below shows the percentage sales of trainers made by a sportwear company in one year. The Flying Boots trainers were lunched at the beginning of that year. 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 93
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 93
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 73
- Task1: The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98387096774 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76415726457 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591397849462 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3901034133 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 13.0 3.83414634146 339% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187395465077 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793337841663 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111041243963 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0638584493694 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0861229509921 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.