The given line graph represents the information regarding three spreads (margarine, low fat and reduced spreads and butter ) which were consumed over 26 years from the year 1981 to 2007. Units are measured in grams.
Looking at the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that consumption of butter and margarine followed the downward trend over the period, While the figure for low fat and reduced spread rose gradually.
Having a glimpse at the illustration reveals that the figure of margarine and butter were divergent generally. Consumption of margarine was 85 grams compared to 145 grams in the former year. The utilization of butter increased by 20 grams, whereas margarine decreased by 20 grams in the year 1986. The figure for butter falling dramatically and reached 50 grams in the later year.
Shifting to the remaining data, the growth was flat between the year 1991 to 1996 in the case of margarine and hit 40 grams in the later year. Growth of low fat and reduced spreads was grown consistently by 80 grams in the year 2001 and decreased by 10 grams in the year 2007.
- The chart bellow shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008 73
- The chart below gives information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projection for 2050 67
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 61
- A lot of people spend a major part of their adult life at work so job satisfaction is very important for individual happiness What are the main factors that contribute to job satisfaction What are the possible solutions for people who are unsatisfied w 56
- The line graph shows the number of bananas imported to 4 countries from 1996 to 2004 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., low fat and reduced spreads and butter which were consumed over 26 years from t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, regarding, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88108108108 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62125937871 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518918918919 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.037261104 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0932891188875 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391968755725 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654560340391 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0744206792154 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743901753569 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.