The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph below illustrates the information about the amount of three kinds of spreads which were consumed between 1981 and 2007. The units are measured in grams.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that both Butter and Margarine experienced significant downward trends, whereas Low fat and reduced spreads saw a dramatic upward trend. Another interesting point is that in 1981, Butter was the number one food, but in 2007, Low fat and reduced spreads headed the list.
Looking at the details, with respect to Butter, it stood at just over 140 grams in 1981. After that, the consump...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-24 | Snehagautam | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | Nihad | 67 | view |
| 2021-05-21 | btv999222@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2021-04-25 | rojababa | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | pramodj | 67 | view |
- Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males and females from certain profession because of their gender? 76
- The table shows the percentage of very good rated by first year students 71
- some people say that what children watch on TV influences their behavior while others say the amount of time they spend watching TV influences their behavior Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
- Buying things on the Internet, such as books, air tickets and groceries, is becoming more and more popular.Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own kn 70
- Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries. Do you agree or disagree? 75
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
1. forget: 'Low fat and reduced spreads' started at 1996
2. No. of Words: 278 200 //the second paragraph is relatively more
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 10
No. of Words: 278 250
No. of Characters: 1315 1000
No. of Different Words: 158 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.083 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.73 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.556 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 84 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 61 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 40 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 27 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.533 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.098 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.533 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.343 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.53 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.078 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below illustrates the information about...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... 10 grams, which was considerably lower as opposed to the remaining foods. Followi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, still, then, whereas, in contrast, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 278.0 196.424390244 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91726618705 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63798588227 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 106.607317073 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60071942446 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 283.868780488 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.5805026543 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1333333333 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141423112666 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460796054578 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615631945731 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110235462896 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725951126288 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.