The graph below shows difference sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005.
The line chart illustrates three different categories which accounted for air pollutants (million tonnes), in the UK, from 1990 to 2005.
Overall, the total amount of air pollutants fell quickly over the period. Besides, the number of the industry was by far the most significant dropped in this time.
There was a dramatic decrease in the total air pollutants from 7 (1990) to 4 million tonnes (1999). Between 1999 and 2005, this figure continuously declined from 4 to just over 3 million tonnes. By contrast, the number of air pollutants in transport fluctuated slightly around 1 million tonnes over sixteen years.
The figure of air pollutants in industry reduced suddenly from 5.5 (1990) to 3 million tonnes (1996). In the next 10 years, this number gradually fell to 2 million tonnes which were double the figure for transport in 2005. Besides, the air pollutants of households contributed 0.8 million tonnes at the beginning of this time. Although this number varied over the period, it always remained below 1 million tonnes in the whole time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | dothai | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-06 | prathamesh27 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | quanganh3110 | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-14 | JennieD | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | elteembored | 67 | view |
- These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work. What could be the reasons for this? Do you think it is a positive or a negative development? 61
- The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. 67
- The graph below shows difference sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. 56
- The table below shows the amount of waste production (in millions of tonnes) in six differentcountries over a twenty-year period. 56
- The pie charts compare the proportion of carbohydrates protein and fat in three different diets namely an average diet a healthy diet and a healthy diet for sport 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ries which accounted for air pollutants million tonnes, in the UK, from 1990 to 2005. ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62371271496 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511494252874 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 16.6 43.030603864 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.0 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.6 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266801680584 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128607090504 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101266941531 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195731041348 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100213386101 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.