The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas.
Information pertaining the disparities in the figure of export of wheat, calibrated in millions of tonnes, over Australia, Canada and European Community is evinced in assigned linear chart.
With regard to 1985, Canada had the highest export value, comprising as around 20 million; whereas, the least quantity of wheat was transported by Australia (15 million) and approximately 17 million tonnes of wheat was exported by European community in the meantime. However, the total trade of wheat declined slightly in the consecutive year before upsurging to around 25 million in 1988, which was its peak point. This figure, although, plunged by 10 million in 1989 and finally jumped to nearly 20 in the last year.
Further scrutinizing, the transport of wheat by Australia remained almost similar with some fluctuations till 1987, whereafter its export figure dwindled slightly to nearabout 10 million in 1990. Howbeit, after initial minor decrease, wheat traded by European community stayed plateaued at 15 million until 1988, whereupon, this value soared and arrived its zenith of just over 20 million by 1990.
Overall, it can be inferred that the wheat export of Australia diminished over the given time period; whilst, opposite was true in case of European community. Meanwhile, the figure of Canada had substantial oscillations.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-01-16 | honguyenlily | 67 | view |
2023-12-05 | MinhGoal1 | view | |
2023-11-16 | nguyenkhangtriem | 84 | view |
2023-11-16 | nguyenkhangtriem | 84 | view |
2023-11-09 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
- Some people think that managers alone should make decisions in the company while others think that employees should be involved in the decision making process too Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Essay topics Nowadays many people go shopping in their free time Shopping has replaced many other activities that people used to choose as their hobby what is the reason for this Is this a positive or negative development 84
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas 78
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...umped to nearly 20 in the last year. Further scrutinizing, the transport of wheat by...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, so, whereas, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1134.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45192307692 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8034576865 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596153846154 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8382316186 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.75 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125869331835 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601386872085 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433510224558 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924921451266 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0149678550049 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.