The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.
You should write at least 150 words.
The chart gives information about four means of transport which the residents of a European city utilized to go to and from their workplaces in 1960, 1980 and 2000.
Overall, it can be seen that the number of people using a car accounts for the highest figure of 4 vehicles. Also, it is notable that the percentage of people driving increase dramatically, while others witnessed a fall during the period of 40 years.
To begin with, in 1960, the proportion of city dwellers choosing bus as their main mean of transport was nearly three times as much as that for car, with 20% for the former and 7% for the latter. During a period of 20 years, more people tended to use private cars as the data experienced a sharp increase to 25% and eventually reached a peak at about 37% in 2000. On the contrary, after rising to 27% in 1980, the statistic for bus users suddenly went down to 18% in the final 20 years.
In 1960, more people used bikes or walked to work than other means, with 27 % and 35% respectively. However, there was a significant decline in both kinds of transport in the following 40 years, which ended up the data with 7% and 10 % in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-27 | yennguyen189 | 84 | view |
- Some people claim that study abroad has great benefits to a student s home country To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that the main purpose of school is to turn children into good citizens and workers rather than to benefit children as individuals To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Modern forms of communication such as email and messaging have reduced the amount of time people spend seeing their friends This has a negative effect on their social lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Many people put their personal information online address telephone number and so on for purposes such as signing up for social networks or online banking Is this a positive or negative development 78
- The advantages and disadvantages of technology on family relationship 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to bus'
Suggestion: to bus
...he proportion of city dwellers choosing bus as their main mean of transport was nea...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, well, while, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44339622642 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47375957159 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599056603774 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2613615027 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.75 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153363938622 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672058480437 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580361716981 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102682930038 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657301580423 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to bus'
Suggestion: to bus
...he proportion of city dwellers choosing bus as their main mean of transport was nea...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, well, while, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44339622642 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47375957159 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599056603774 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2613615027 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.75 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153363938622 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672058480437 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580361716981 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102682930038 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657301580423 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.