The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014.
The bar chart compares the percentage of female who were unemployed in four nations of the United Kingdom between 2013 and 2014.
Overall, there were an upward trend in the level of women without job in surveyed countries, with exception of Scotland. In addition, while England topped the list at the beginning of the surveyed period, Scotland climbed to the first rank at the end of survey.
A glance at the chart provided reveals that in 2013, unemployment women accounted for 6.8% ( the first rank), which was roughly 1.4% higher than that of Wales and Northern Ireland, at 5.4% and 5.6% respectively. However, we can see the converse trend in 2014, England dropped slightly to 6.5%, similarly, Wales and Northern Ireland showed a downward trend, at 5% and 4.6% in that order.
A striking feature is the proportion of women who were unemployed in Scotland. In 2013, the rate of people without job hold the runner-up, at 6.1%, it then increased significantly to 6.7% at the end of survey.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-11 | Kien Vu | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | Kien Vu | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | satyaSarada | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | testIELTS09999999999 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | Hendra | 78 | view |
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901. 73
- The table below gives information about changes in mode of travel in England between 1985 to 2000 56
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000. 84
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010. 73
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...3, unemployment women accounted for 6.8% the first rank, which was roughly 1.4% h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, similarly, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87573964497 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62218986652 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603550295858 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5539643003 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.714285714 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160191656487 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791059593242 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0914032504294 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118901839214 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106413958259 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.