The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart compares unemployment levels of women in the four UK’s countries: England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland in two different years: 2013 and 2014.
Overall, the levels of unemployment in the UK slightly dropped in 2014 compared to those in 2013 with an exception in Scotland with showing a gradual increase in 2014.
In England, the female jobless rates in 2013 stood at 6.8%, then it declined to 6.5% in 2014. Showing the same similarities, Wales’ unemployment levels of women had a 0.4% reduction from 5.4% in 2013 to 5.0% in 2014. It was also followed by those rates in Northern Ireland with a significant improvement. Women who did not have jobs in this country significantly reduced from 5.6% to 4.6%. Contrary, the number of unemployed women in Scotland gradually climbed with a 0.6% increase. In 2013, the number of Scotland’s women without having jobs was around 6.1% in 2013, it then soared to 6.7% in 2014.
- In some countries a high proportion of criminal acts are committed by teenagers Why has this happened what can be done to deal with this 78
- The tendency of human beings to copy one another is shown in the popularity of fashion clothes and consumer goods. To what extent do you agree? 61
- The pie charts show the percentage of car ownership by make in three countries in 2015.Summarise the information by select and report the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- some people think that the increase of cheap air travel has brought about many benefits while others argue that this development has its drawbacks to the world's environment and resources. Discuss these two points of view. what's your opinion? 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 810.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0625 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87754642665 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56875 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0438595785 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.25 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17532462841 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087271474474 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465165850804 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122207722392 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357062382228 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.