The graph below shows four countries of residence of overseas students in Australia.
The line graph illustrates how many people from four South Asia countries went to Australia in order to study there between 1982 and 2000 and is measured in 1000 s.
Overall, it can be seen that the number of students increased from all countries, and that the highest number of students were from Indonesia.
In 1982, the quantity of students from Malaysia accounted for about 6, in contrast Indonesia accounted for 0. Then for the following year the number for Malaysia rose steadily to about 8.5 while Indonesia leveled off. Between 1984 and 1992, there was a gradual increase in the number of students from Indonesia while Malaysia experienced a margin growth and in 1992 the number of students for both countries accounted for about 10. Then they both followed the same pattern to finish the period at about 243 for Indonesia and about 17 for Malasya.
There were no students in Australia from Hong Kong and Singapore in 1982, for the next seven years the number of students from them leveled off. For the following 7 years while the number of students from Hong Kong rose at varying rates to finish the period at about 18, Singapore witnessed a gradual rise and comprised of about 19 in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-24 | jenmin | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | Kamal1993 | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-14 | lekhoa.2910 | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-04 | Lê Võ Nhật Quang | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-27 | r.hojat | 78 | view |
- The chart below gives information about the percentage of the adult population who were overweight in four different countries in 1980 1990 and 2000 Figures are given for the year or the nearest year available 72
- The carts below show the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two different groups in one European country 84
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 38
- Many people think hosting as international sporting event is beneficial to a country, while others disagree.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 61
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76076555024 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38606832244 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478468899522 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2458051329 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.375 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124465135924 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686346035838 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582340401407 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991370904024 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483314495994 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.