The graph below shows the hours of teaching per year done by each teacher in four different countries in 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph illustrates the information about the amount of teaching hours by each tutor in 4 various nations in 2001. Units are measured in hours.
It is readily apparent that there was an upward trend in all areas. Additionally, the number of hours in the USA had the highest number among these above-mentioned categories.
Looking at the details, both primary and secondary teachers in Japan and Spain taught for 600 hours respectively. Likewise, upper secondary teachers only taught for around nearly 700 hours. Conversely, the amount of teaching in the upper secondary in Spain was higher than Japan which reached nearly 1000 hours teaching per year.
In Iceland, the hours of teaching per year in lower secondary and upper secondary reached under 800 hours while in primary only spent 600 hours teaching per year. It is clear that the hours of teaching in the USA reached a pinnacle of 1100 hours in upper secondary. The number of hours in primary and lower secondary stand at 800 hours and over 1000 hours respectively.
- The graph below shows the hours of teaching per year done by each teacher in four different countries in 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than the other ones Which types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think that the advantages of preserving these old buildings outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 million Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, likewise, look, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02873563218 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61988922037 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494252873563 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2906324001 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201223608249 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827485601723 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693845007976 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121333572468 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625115384721 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.