The graph below shows the hours of teaching per year done by each teacher in four different countries in 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given chart illustrates how much time was taught by each teacher from four different countries in 2001.
Overall, it can be seen that teachers in the US work long hours, while the least time is spent teaching in the Japanese language. Moreover, upper secondary school educators spend more time than other teachers.
In 2001, teachers in Japan’s primary schools worked for 600 hours. Lower and upper secondary hours were higher, at 650 and 700 hours, respectively. With Spain, it increased from primary school about 650 hours to 700 hours for upper secondary school.
Teachers at upper secondary schools in the USA work approximately 1200 hours per year. More than hours were taught in lower secondary school, at 1000 hours, followed by primary school instructors. In Iceland, the number of educators in primary and lower secondary schools is nearly equal to 600. However, upper secondary teachers were nearly double, at 900 hours. Primary and lower secondary teachers in Iceland taught for an average of 550 hours per year. This is significantly lower than those in the USA. In comparison, upper secondary teachers in both countries taught a similar amount of hours.
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country What are the reasons Solutions to change negative attitudes 78
- The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile cell phones in a European country from January to September 2002 measured in euro 73
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons for this and how can people learn more about the natural world 61
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons for this and how can people learn more about the natural world 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The charts below show the proportion of the energy produced from different sources in a country between 1985 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 985.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15706806283 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55308487378 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523560209424 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.9961534763 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.7692307692 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6923076923 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07692307692 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139323001042 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644755261528 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580492452129 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102714808316 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564036946875 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.