The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001 and 2007.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
The given line graph indicates the proportion of first-year instructors who were hired to teach English and French in Ontario from 2001 to 2007. As can be seen from the graph, the percentage of French educators experienced an upward trend whereas an opposite pattern was true for the counterpart. Also of note is that more French language instructors succeed in finding jobs since 2003.
It is evident that at the beginning of the surveyed period, the figure for the recruitment rate of first-year instructors majoring in English stood at above 70%, followed by a plummet over the following two years before reaching a plateau at 40% in 2003. Afterwards, it witnessed a minimal climb to approximately 44% in the next two years . Thereafter, there existed a significant decline by about 16% in the rate of English educators who were employed in Ontario during the remaining time.
In contrast, there was a slight increase in the employment of first-year teachers in French. It saw a marked dip by of nearly 20% after standing at 70% in 2001. In the following year, there was a notable growth to approximately 69% in the figure of French language educators in Ontario, followed by a continuous oscillation around 70% during the remaining part of the investigated period when it reached the peak of 73% in 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-09 | quynhhtrangg2512 | 73 | view |
- The bar chart shows the results of a survey which asked people the causes of crime 73
- Traffic and accommodation problems are increasing and government should encourage some businesses to move from cities to rural areas. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this policy? 89
- It is shown that meetings, training and discussions now happen online. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh its disadvantages? 89
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the Internet everyday from 2003 to 2006. 78
- The table below gives information about the use of different modes of transport in Shanghai in 1996, and one possible projection (high motorization scenario) for their use in 2020.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... pattern was true for the counterpart. Also of note is that more French language in...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s succeed in finding jobs since 2003. It is evident that at the beginning of t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... approximately 44% in the next two years . Thereafter, there existed a significant...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in Ontario during the remaining time. In contrast, there was a slight increase...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...achers in French. It saw a marked dip by of nearly 20% after standing at 70% in 2...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1094.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95022624434 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89935118921 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565610859729 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.5468209815 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.555555556 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5555555556 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0979653938367 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041204784545 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307377574136 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0681364449185 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00300538591255 0.0819641961636 4% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.