The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby public library from 2011 to 2014.
The line graph illustrates the information about the male and female who read number of books in library of Burnaby during the year 2011 to 2014.
In 2011, the graph show the data about number of books read by the male candidate was near about 3000 books however in this era, the women candidate more interested to read the books in public library near about 5000 number of books.
According the data, the male candidate interested during the year of 2012 while, the female candidate also read more books. After 2012, it was suddenly peaked near about 10000 books. In contrast, year of 2013 number of the reader female collapse suddenly and reached to near about 8000.
Overall, in year 2013 it was the particular year when male and female shown the equal interest to read the books. After the male candidate reached near about 14000 number of books while the female candidate had went to downward side in Burnaby during the 2011 to 2014.
- Many museum charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museum outweigh the disadvantages. 56
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing.What do yuou think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 61
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing.What do yuou think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 61
- some people work for the same organization all their working life. others think that it is better to work for different organization.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 56
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby public library from 2011 to 2014. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 115, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n the equal interest to read the books. After the male candidate reached near about 1...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[6]
Message: Note: went is a past participle of "wend". Did you mean 'gone' (past participle of "go")?
Suggestion: gone
...of books while the female candidate had went to downward side in Burnaby during the ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ide in Burnaby during the 2011 to 2014.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 785.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75757575758 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.09809043444 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 68.0 106.607317073 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.412121212121 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1560829119 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.142857143 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257715328889 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132345727018 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133393316446 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209239951353 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125681729094 0.0819641961636 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.69 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.