The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates how many books read by males and females at Burnaby Public library during the years 2011 to 2014. It should be pointed out that the number of books studied by men and women has different changes in these years.
On the one hand, the graph shows that men read almost 3000 books in the year 2011. This number is increased slightly to nearly 4000 in 2012. It worth noting that between 2012 and 2013, the number of books read by males significantly rises to 10000, which is the same number as women in 2013. The number of books is reached to 14000 in 2014.
On the other hand, the number of studied books by women is bot increased and decreased. In fact, the number of books was almost 5000 in 2011, which was more than men in that year. This number is grown significantly to 1000 for two years, but suddenly it is reduced to almost 7000 by the year 2014.
In general, the number of books read by men and women is increased until the year 2013 when both men and women studied 10000 books, but this number is reduced for women group and increased for men group by the year 2014.
- The breakthroughs in medical science are by far the most significant advances in world society over the last two centuries Discuss the statement and give your opinion 89
- The Charts below show the proportion of British students at one university who were able to speak another language in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 61
- Some people believe that employment over the age of 60 is not right and creates lots of problems. So people should retire after 60 and not work.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams, by subject and gender, during the period 2010-2011.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relev 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, in fact, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.38349514563 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.04290509133 2.65546596893 77% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45145631068 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.044765915 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313767068054 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146313193243 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730022505556 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224130675313 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599723036043 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.12 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.01 8.06136585366 75% => OK
difficult_words: 18.0 40.7170731707 44% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.