The graph below shows the number of complaints made about noise to Environmental Health authorities in the city of Newtown between 1980 and 1996.
The line graph depicts the number of complaints received at Environmental authorities in NewTown from 1980 to 1996. Overall, all the number of complaints related to noise increased substantially, except for the road work related complaints despite which complaints were dominant at the beginning of the projected period.
Initially, environmental authorities received complaints that are mainly related to road works of over 600 complaints in 1980, whereas other complaints were recorded at about 500 to 400 complaints for domestic and factory noises, relatively. The lowest number of complaints made were related to the traffic noises of 300 complaints.
After 1980, the domestic noise complaints grew significantly with a periodic stablisation for the first 8 years, which number grew more than doubled to end at over 1,200 complaints by 1996. This trend was similar for the traffic complaints as which number of complaints experienced a periodic stablisation for the first 8 years at around 300 before it peaked to 600 complaints. Meanwhile, the factory complaints showed a parabola line to reach at its peak in 1988 of close to 800 complaints before declining to 700 complaints by 1996.
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of time since digital technology is now replacing their function. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology for outweigh the disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Motorways help people travel quickly and cover long distances but they also cause problems. What are the problems of motorways and what solutions are there? 73
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year. 73
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 78
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'if', 'whereas', 'while', 'except for']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.252475247525 0.268076937826 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.118811881188 0.116061578633 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0693069306931 0.0759168565197 91% => OK
Adverbs: 0.039603960396 0.0366838410393 108% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00990099009901 0.0131127313244 76% => OK
Prepositions: 0.183168316832 0.155750635184 118% => OK
Participles: 0.039603960396 0.0379272487307 104% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.06349443303 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Infinitives: 0.049504950495 0.0210936926555 235% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0841584158416 0.0948980150116 89% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.019801980198 0.00967000014798 205% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1192.0 1161.00487805 103% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.9 95% => OK
Chars per words: 6.3743315508 5.90752243213 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73763899035 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.401069518717 0.337110787985 119% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.320855614973 0.247514529752 130% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.235294117647 0.171178102325 137% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.181818181818 0.112407865282 162% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06349443303 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51871657754 0.546246751206 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 44.2529386616 49.3433353143 90% => OK
How many sentences: 7.0 8.93414634146 78% => OK
Sentence length: 26.7142857143 23.0094962315 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.453217496 42.9750493124 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.285714286 135.714022679 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 23.0094962315 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.714285714286 0.689975730869 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.84146341463 78% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 58.7998472116 47.7609492067 123% => OK
Elegance: 2.82352941176 2.94281807926 96% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.52383575263 0.418131533498 125% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.234655826714 0.181151798455 130% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0527791780213 0.0850326197045 62% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.767497222458 0.706616315825 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0749983636769 0.157042692854 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.335869470819 0.228904883108 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116871619796 0.108899403657 107% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.52487556689 0.367819155151 143% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0259376178434 0.0812612215331 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.430425986237 0.316326947829 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.090779049881 0.0921553760075 99% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70731707317 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.14146341463 613% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.08536585366 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 0.0 3.16585365854 0% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 7.0 0.956097560976 732% => Less negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.02926829268 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 7.0 7.1512195122 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.