The graph below shows the number of complaints made about noise to Environmental Health authorities in the city of Newtown between 1980 and 1996. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons wh

The graph gives information about how many complains received to Environmental Health authorities by the residents of Newton city according to the reasons of noise from 1980 to 1996.
At a quick glance of the graph reveals that except the domestic and households related noise complains which was the major reason for irritation of people in 1980, the number of noise complains due to factories, traffic and road works increased noticeably over the given time period.
In 1980, the action of people in their houses reported as approximately over 600 which were significantly higher compared to the others. Then, the recorded noise complains about this reason decreased steeply until 1988 when it leveled off for two years after declining again dramatically to a lower number as 100. On the other hand, the number of complaints due to factories gradually increased over a six-year period starting from 400, after it remained stable for a decade by reaching to just above 600.
Meanwhile, the number of complaints to reach Environmental Health authorities about road works and traffic were stayed in the same as nearly as 500 and 300, respectively in 4-year period time. Then, they showed the same trend as decreasing slightly before leveling off between 1989 and 1988. In 1996, both of them had reached a triple amount which was calculated as 1200 and 600.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... again dramatically to a lower number as 100. On the other hand, the number of co...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1137.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07589285714 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69476873582 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.1931052617 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.125 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227632831436 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959920768083 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739573415987 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148928409572 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735022352853 0.0819641961636 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.