The graph below shows the number of complaints made about noise to Environmental Health authorities in the city of Newtown between 1980 and 1996 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The assigned graph illustrates the information regarding the complaints which were received by environmental health authorities in Newton city over a course of 16 years.
At a fleeting glance, it is immensely clear that initiating at 500 complaints in the starting period and stagnating at same point till 1984 before showing gradual decline by 100 complaints in following 2 years, the complaints registered by environmental health authorities due to noise produced from road works surged by almost 3 times in December. Between 1980 and 1996, the number of complaints owing to traffic noise followed similar pattern to that of the complaints related to road works from 300 to 600 complaints in final year.
Moving to complaints received regarding factory noise, 400 complaints was recorded in 1990 and then it rose to 600 in 1982. Further scrutinizing the linear representation, hovering between 600 and 800 in upcoming 14 years and ended at 700 complaints. Setting off at 650 complaints in the initial year, the complaints related to domestic noise accounted for declining in whole period to 100 complaints in the fall of the year.

Overall, it is lucid that complaints which were received due to domestic voice followed the overall declining trend as against other elements , which displayed overall rising trend.

Votes
Average: 4.4 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...n 1990 and then it rose to 600 in 1982. Further scrutinizing the linear representation,...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing off at 650 complaints in the initial year, the complaints related to domestic...
^^
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...eclining trend as against other elements , which displayed overall rising trend.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1110.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95024362854 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580952380952 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.9442927024 43.030603864 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.571428571 112.824112599 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20118385759 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987793538829 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677073440951 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124050806456 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745033548854 0.0819641961636 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.2329268293 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.