The graph below shows the number of complaints made about noise to Environmental Health authorities in the city of Newtown between 1980 and 1996.
The line graph gives information about the number of reported claims about noise in Newtown over the timescale of 16 years from 1980 to 1996.
The general overview here is that the amount of noise caused by road works had reduced whereas that of other sources had increased. This is especially striking in the surge of complaints regarding domestic households and a marked decrease in that number of road works.
The period 1980-1984 saw the greatest number of claims concerning road works, at well over 600 and its decrease to 400 by the end. The reverse is true for factories: the level of discontent reached the initial number of complaints about road works. This is different for the other two sources of noise - DH and Traffic - which were steady during these four years.
From then on until 1988, fluctuations in the numbers became even more dramatic. The figures for traffic and domestic/household noise had the same tendency of growth: by 1986, they had reduced by 50 and then rebound. Others were following a similar trend.
Subsequently, the gap between the numbers of reports had increased, with the domestic/household doubling the number of claims.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-19 | annalee26112000 | view | |
| 2022-07-28 | Ngoc21 | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-28 | Ngoc21 | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-04 | Munira Poʻlatova | 100 | view |
| 2021-01-05 | leo_19 | 67 | view |
- The maps show the Grange park as it is today and as it was a century earlier 89
- These days much of the foods people eat gets transported from farms that are thousannds of miles away Some people believe that it would be better for the environment and the economy if people only consume food produced by local farmers Would the advantage 89
- Many people think that students learn course materials more effectively by taking exams while others think that students learn more effectively by doing other activities like completing projects Which one do you think is more effective 90
- The reading states that TV appearances benefit professors and their universities However the lecturer questions these benefits 80
- Summarise the points in the lecture and explain how they cast doubt on the point made in the reading 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ousehold doubling the number of claims.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, then, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03626943005 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80487975274 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585492227979 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5746627128 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209081998885 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797429075819 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797950146029 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127449663159 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875987042336 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.