The graph below shows the number of complaints made about noise to Environmental Health authorities in the city of Newtown between 1980 and 1996 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of complaints made about noise to Environmental Health authorities in the city of Newtown between 1980 and 1996.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph depicts the data about how many complaints about noise environmental health authorities in the city of Newtown received from 1980 to 1996.
In general, the number of noisy complaints about roadworks, factories, and traffic increased, whereas domestic complaints decreased. In addition, roadwork noise complaints had the largest erratic over the period given.
Looking at the details between 1980 and 1986, roadwork and traffic noise complaints had a similar pattern. In the first four years, they were stable at 500 and 300, respectively, and in the next two years, they declined slightly to 400 and 200 in sequence, then remained at this level for the next two years. However, in the remaining time, while roadwork noise complaints surged and peaked at over 1,200, traffic noise complaints rose significantly to 600. Meanwhile, noise complaints about factories increased significantly from 400 to 600 in the first two years before gradually declining to less than 800 in the following eight years. In the final six years, this saw a slight fall to 700 in the last year of the survey.
In contrast, complaints about domestic noise witnessed a consistent decrease, falling from over 600 in 1980 to just 100 in 1996.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-02-19 annalee26112000 view
2022-07-28 Ngoc21 73 view
2022-07-28 Ngoc21 73 view
2021-01-05 leo_19 67 view
2020-11-28 CCphuonguyen 73 view
Essays by user Ngoc21 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, then, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.175 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75077716291 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6710911856 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224163465038 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10794160057 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100117884489 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179296172011 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104331471171 0.0819641961636 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, then, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.175 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75077716291 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6710911856 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224163465038 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10794160057 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100117884489 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179296172011 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104331471171 0.0819641961636 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.