The graph below shows the number of hours per day on average that children spent watching television. The graph covers the period between 1950 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph plots the hours per day on average that children spent in front of the television set over a 60-year period from 1950 to 2010.
In general, there was a significant rise in televison viewing. At the end of the period, the number of hours per day on average that children took to watch television was much higher than the beginning.
From 1950 to 1960, in the rate of children’s television viewing increased slightly, from just about fifteen minutes per day to nearly one hour per day. In the next 20-year period, the rate rose considerably, from under one hour per day to approximately four hours per day. Between 1980 and 1990, there was a small decrease. However, this trend proved negligible as the rate then rose again. In 1995, the hours children spent watching television per day had reached its peak with over four hours per day before it dropped gradually.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-02-28 | lili__nhnh | view |
- Is freedom of speech necessary in a free society 73
- To some people studying the past has little value in the modern world Why do you think it is important to do so What will be the effect if children are not taught history 73
- The graph compares the percentage of international and the percentage of UK students gaining second class degrees or better at a major UK university Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 39
- The graph below shows the percentage of part time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- The education you receive from your family is more important than the education you receive from school To what extent do you agree with this statement and why 56