The presented line graph outlines the numbers of passenger changes over 55 years time period in three different type of railway journey.
A glance at a graph reveals that National rail network and London underground had the highest number of people over the span in contrast to the light rails and metro systems.
National rail network had 1000 million passengers in the year 1950, as t figures reach its peak about 1100millions at 1960. it then began to decrease significantly for up to 20 years, rebound itself in the period of 1980 to 1990 with approximately 800 millions passenger which depicts similar features with London underground within this year, before that it had maintained the stable number of data which as around 700millions over the period of 30 years. This figures rose marginally by both, touching around 1100 at the end of the year 2004.
In contrast, light rail and metro system had not any number of passengers up to 1990 and then it steadily increased 60 million, reaching around 180 million at the end of the year.
- some people think that criminals should be given longer terms in prison, so as to reduce the crime rate. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 73
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 73
- The chart below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they are received from employers. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to the light rails and metro systems. National rail network had 1000 million p...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ch its peak about 1100millions at 1960. it then began to decrease significantly fo...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...und 1100 at the end of the year 2004. In contrast, light rail and metro system...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd 180 million at the end of the year.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87078651685 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5699223129 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601123595506 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.0756399625 43.030603864 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.5 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129640733019 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738537693434 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630656223143 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0972905301095 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619817246657 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.