The line graph gives an overview of four European countries theft per thousand vechiles in the year between 1990 and 1999. overall, at the begining of the period great britian had the greatest number of thief per thousand vechiles in comparision to the France and canada which was used to be the lowest thefts per vechile ratio.
The general trend of britian was that it had appoximately 18 numbers of theft, which rose upto 20 at the year 1992, again it dip recover in the year 1993 followed by the peak level i.e almost 21 in the middle of the year 1996- 1997. Moreover, instead of sweden which had almost 6 number of thefts gradually escalate up to ( 13) at the end of period i.e 1999
Another striking feature is that both france and canada have had minimal difference in the number of theft almost 6 which marginally decreases upto the 5 number in 1993 and then it maintains its steady rise and have had stabilize at 6 number of theft per 1000 vechiles as like initial period of time.
- The chart below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they are received from employers. 67
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 72
- some people think that criminals should be given longer terms in prison, so as to reduce the crime rate. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...raph gives an overview of four European countries theft per thousand vechiles in the year...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...iles in the year between 1990 and 1999. overall, at the begining of the period great br...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the lowest thefts per vechile ratio. The general trend of britian was that it...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 138, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dips'?
Suggestion: dips
...rose upto 20 at the year 1992, again it dip recover in the year 1993 followed by th...
^^^
Line 2, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...umber of thefts gradually escalate up to 13 at the end of period i.e 1999 ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...p to 13 at the end of period i.e 1999 Another striking feature is that both fr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'stabilized'.
Suggestion: stabilized
... maintains its steady rise and have had stabilize at 6 number of theft per 1000 vechiles ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'stabilized'.
Suggestion: stabilized
... maintains its steady rise and have had stabilize at 6 number of theft per 1000 vechiles ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...theft per 1000 vechiles as like initial period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...chiles as like initial period of time.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50555555556 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2935430029 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 45.0 22.4926829268 200% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 114.648102906 43.030603864 266% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 202.75 112.824112599 180% => OK
Words per sentence: 45.0 22.9334400587 196% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167017551915 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146424113351 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153543684981 0.0843802449381 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125570037685 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103340410097 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.3 13.2329268293 169% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.3012195122 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.77 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.0 10.9970731707 182% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.