Nowadays, various categories of food travel a long distance before it met its customer. in my opinion it has both positive and negative trend too which I like to discuss in this passage.
At first, I would like to describe its positive effects on the basis of easier availability of food and its need. Different countries have their own culture of foods and are different in different countries. because of food travelling miles, each country can get to know about others countries food cultures which gives them a new experience of feelings, in addition of its need, for instance, countries like Somalia availability of food is the indeed factor to prevent people dying from lack of food resources.
secondly, natural calamities increase the deprivation of foods in affected areas, in the sense of humanity many other not affected countries help in this condition by travelling their own foods miles away. To illustrate this, small developing country Nepal had a sudden biggest earthquake that affected more than 80% of total population, in this case, many other countries like Japan India china help Nepal in the food circulation among affected.
In contrast to the discussion about the negative trend, I want to discuss the affordability and the quality of food travelling machine. As the food travel hundreds of miles it could reach to the customers in the high price where the customer can not afford such types. As far I am concerned, food depends on different factor like temperatures and soon for its longevity, but I do not think all the factors are maintained in this travelling process.
To sum up, easy access to food and food availability by affected countries people belongs to positive trend whereas inevitable quality loss and affordability by customers are related to negative trends of food traves.
- The chart below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they are received from employers. 67
- the pie chart show the electricity generated in Germany and france from all sources and renewables in the year 2009. summarize the information by selecting and reporting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 73
- the graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in great britain between 1950 and 2005 56
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ng distance before it met its customer. in my opinion it has both positive and neg...
^^
Line 2, column 208, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...d are different in different countries. because of food travelling miles, each country ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...ple dying from lack of food resources. secondly, natural calamities increase the depriv...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...the quality of food travelling machine. As the food travel hundreds of miles it co...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, for instance, in addition, in contrast, in contrast to, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77995003952 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546666666667 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.1522262297 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.818181818 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5454545455 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302891304998 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127204346022 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508404724052 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190739713328 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560191550491 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.