the graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017. Summarise the information by reporting the main feature and make comparisons where posssible.
The line graph below provides information on the number of visitors touring a specific Caribbean island between 2010 to 2017. This number in million divided into three categories visitors living on cruise ships, a visitor staying on the island, and total number. As an overall trend, the number of tourists increased from 2010 to 2017.
In first type people staying on cruise ships were lowest in all kinds. Its number rose abruptly and the lowest was in 2010 0.3 million and highest in the 2017 2 million tourists. In 2011 this number climbed to 0.5 million in contrast 2012 thsi number fall to 0.2 million visitors. In next years onward till 2017 this number increases smoothly and peaked at 2 million individuals who stayed on cruise ship.
In case of staying on Island number was 0.7 million in 2010 which remain constant for a year and after a year in 2011 this figure start climbing to 1.5 million in 2013. For next couple of years till 2015 this figure remained same and from onward this number started reclining and in 2017 its again climbed to 1.5 million customers. Which with comparison to stayers on ships was lesser than living on island.
The total number of visitors which were one million in 2010 culminated to 3.5 million in 2017 in smooth ascending order.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-20 | vicky sharma | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-16 | Farwa Nasir | 73 | view |
- The bar charts below show the percentages of men and women in employment in three countries in 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the injuries that occur at home Summarise the main information by reporting the main features and make comparisons where possible 50
- The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 to 2010 Summaries the information and make comparison where possible 61
- The table below show the monthly family expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001 Summarise the information and make comparison where possible 73
- the map shows the changes in Pentland from 1980 to 2008 Summarise the information and make comparisons where possible 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below provides information on the numbe...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...nd between 2010 to 2017. This number in million divided into three categories visitors ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...individuals who stayed on cruise ship. In case of staying on Island number was 0....
^^
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...again climbed to 1.5 million customers. Which with comparison to stayers on ships was...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76126126126 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26234226342 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509009009009 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1879809199 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0909090909 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36363636364 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196181220085 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101414588892 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917533096263 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14118949497 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0901386365519 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.