The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph illustrates the number of visitors visiting a particular Caribbean island from 2010 to 2017.
Overall, it can be seen that the highest number of tourists went to that particular island to spend their leisure in 2017. It is also evident that the number of visitors staying on the island dominated the number of tourists who preferred to stay on cruise ships till 2015, but then the latter took the driving seat.
In detail, approximately 800 thousand and 300 thousand tourists stayed on a cruise ship in 2010. While the numbers remain unchanged for island stayers in 2011, there was a moderate increase in the number of cruise ship stayers at 500, 000. After a slight fell from 2011 to 2012, however, the number of tourists, who preferred to stay on a cruise ship, increased considerably from 2012 to 2017 precisely at 2 million visitors.
On the other hand, there was a moderate rise in 2012 for the number of visitors who wanted to stay on the island rather than stay on a cruise ship by approximately 1 million visitors. After a slight escalation in the following year, the number of tourists who love to stay on the island remained stable till 2015 at 1.5 million visitors. Even after a minimal decline in the very next year, the tourist number leveled off at 1.5 million visitors in 2017.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, then, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70869565217 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50611727948 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482608695652 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4577035412 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.333333333 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5555555556 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193757382317 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111404254235 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0866638799522 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173926501978 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.098193709913 0.0819641961636 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.