The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The Bar graph illustrates the total count of visitors to Caribbean island from the year 2010 to 2017.

Overall, The tourists visiting the Caribbean will stay either in cruise ships or in the island. The total count of tourists increased gradually from 2010 to 2017.

When the tourists residing in Cruise ships are considered, Initially they are 0.25 millions in 2010.Which doubled by the next year and later shrunk to 0.25 by 2012. There after, there is continuous raise of visitors reaching 2 million by 2017.

On the other hand when the visitors staying in island are taken into account, In 2010,they were about 0.75 millions .It remained same till the next year. Afterwards, it climbed to around 1.4 millions by 2012. Once again it expanded in minute amount and reached 1.5 millions by 2013. However,it remained stable from 2013 to 2015 and there is slight decline in 2016 and again reverted to the same position by 2017. To Summarize, When the total number of tourists are taken into account, There is uninterrupted raise of tourists from 2012 where the number is 1 million to 2015 reaching 2.75 million. However, from 2015 to 2016, the sum of count of tourists remained same. Next to that, there is a rapid expansion of tourists after 2016.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al count of visitors to Caribbean island from the year 2010 to 2017. Overall...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... island from the year 2010 to 2017. Overall, The tourists visiting the Cari...
^^
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...017. Overall, The tourists visiting the Caribbean will stay either in cruise...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...creased gradually from 2010 to 2017. When the tourists residing in Cruise shi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Which
...nitially they are 0.25 millions in 2010.Which doubled by the next year and later shru...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: Thereafter
... year and later shrunk to 0.25 by 2012. There after, there is continuous raise of visitors ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f visitors reaching 2 million by 2017. On the other hand when the visito...
^^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...t, In 2010,they were about 0.75 millions .It remained same till the next year. Aft...
^^
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
... In 2010,they were about 0.75 millions .It remained same till the next year. After...
^^
Line 7, column 298, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...nd reached 1.5 millions by 2013. However,it remained stable from 2013 to 2015 and t...
^^^
Line 7, column 393, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ht decline in 2016 and again reverted to the same position by 2017. To Summarize,...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8738317757 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42759145646 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504672897196 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0710378078 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.9166666667 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8333333333 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.16666666667 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165991167693 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706138873438 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595747173098 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13640578819 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606024352847 0.0819641961636 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.