The bar chart illustrate the information from different museums about it's visitors in six years.
Overall, museums from New York and Tokyo had fluctuated rush in each year. Whereas there was a rapid growth reported in the national museum. Another interesting point is that there was the record breaking rush over the period in China's museum.
To begin with the first year, met museum had 12 million visitors. But there was a sudden decrease in the number of visitors in the year 2001 and 2002. The number of tourists where the same in these two years. And then it started growing the number of individuals till the year 2005.
On the other hand Edo welcomed around 13 million people in the two years of beginning. After that, this number went down rapidly for next couple of yours. From 2003 to 2005 the number of guests who wanted to come up to museum was increased slowly.
In the year 2000, the museum from China had invited around the half number of people then the met museum. But, this number was increased over the period. The main point is that, the numerical value of visitors was stopped at 11 million for the year 2003 and 2004.
- There is an increasing amount of advertising directed at children which encourages them to buy goods such as toys and snacks Many parents are worried that these advertisements put too much pressure on children while some advertisers claim that they prov 61
- the chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used internet everyday from 2003 2006 78
- The illustration shows how chocolates is being produced 11
- SOME THINK THAT CLIMATE CHANGE REFORMS WILL NEGATIVELY AFFECT BUSINESS OTHERS FEEL THEY ARE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR BUSINESSES DISCUSS BOTH SIDES AND GIVE YOUR OWN OPINION 78
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements What measures can be taken to protect them 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, then, whereas, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54901960784 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.09202914141 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519607843137 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 204.0 22.4926829268 907% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 928.0 112.824112599 823% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 204.0 22.9334400587 890% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 63.0 5.23603664747 1203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179965654081 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179965654081 0.103423049105 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110848973832 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02746146453 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 102.0 13.2329268293 771% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -110.2 61.2550243902 -180% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 79.3 10.3012195122 770% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.59 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 16.08 8.06136585366 199% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 53.0 11.4329268293 464% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 83.6 10.9970731707 760% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 53.0 11.0658536585 479% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, then, whereas, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54901960784 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.09202914141 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519607843137 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 204.0 22.4926829268 907% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 928.0 112.824112599 823% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 204.0 22.9334400587 890% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 63.0 5.23603664747 1203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179965654081 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179965654081 0.103423049105 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110848973832 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02746146453 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 102.0 13.2329268293 771% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -110.2 61.2550243902 -180% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 79.3 10.3012195122 770% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.59 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 16.08 8.06136585366 199% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 53.0 11.4329268293 464% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 83.6 10.9970731707 760% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 53.0 11.0658536585 479% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.