The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph highlights data about the number of people who visited museums in three different countries, namely MET Museums (New York), Edo Museum (Tokyo), and National Museum (China), over a half-decade between 2000 and 2005.
Overal, what stands out from the graph is that visitors of both MET museum and National Museum increased in numbers, whereas the number of people who visited Edo Museum fluctuated significantly over the period. Another interesting point is that Edo Museum, which had more visitors than other museums at the beginning, had fewer visitors than others in 2005. On contrary, the least popular museum in 2000, National Museum, became the most popular museum in 2005.
Looking at the details, with respect to the visitors of MET Museum, it began at approximately 12 million visitors in 2000, then it plunged to just around 6 millions over the next two years until 2002. Then, the figure went up rapidly, finishing at around 14 million visitors in 2005. This trend also followed by National Museum. Despite increased steadily over the first four years until 2003, at just over 10 million people, the number of visitors then remained steady until 2004. In 2005, the figure began to rose sharply reaching nearly 16 million, which was the highest number of visitors compared to other museums.
In contrast to MET Museum and National Museum, the number of people who visited Edo Museum went in the opposite direction. Having remained stable over the first two years at just under 14 million visitors until 2001, the figure then fluctuated to around 6 million by 2003. After that, despite plummeting, the figure then started to go up gradually and ended at approximately 10 million people in the last two years.
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- The table below shows UK residents visits abroad by country of visit from 2004 to 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 57
- The table below shows the results of a survey to find out what members of a city sports club think about the club s activities facilities and opening hours Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make any comparisons whe 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, so, then, whereas, in contrast, in contrast to, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 33.7804878049 178% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 965.302439024 149% => OK
No of words: 286.0 196.424390244 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04545454545 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41136332583 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482517482517 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 421.2 283.868780488 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2264467086 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.25 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.23603664747 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205048243614 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938362671551 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060159652647 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154513365816 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632548886029 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.