The table below shows UK residents' visits abroad by country of visit from 2004 to 2008.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table shows changes in the number of UK citizens going overseas based on the country visited over a half-decade between 2004 and 2008. It can be seen that the popularity of Egypt, India, and Poland rose dramatically across the period in contrast to Spain and USA, which dropped slightly from 2004 to 2008.
Poland, the least popular country in 2004, shows the biggest upward trend over the period. The visitors of Poland increased substantially around five times, from 304 to 1,578, in just over five years. Meanwhile, Egypt and India had a similar trend by having a significant increase about 300 visitors in the five-year period, from 345 to 664 and from 657 to 956 in turn.
Contrary to the upward trend, the popularity of Spain and USA met a slight fall from their original numbers after five years. Despite being the most popular country over the period, Spain only had an increase between 2005 and 2006, from 13,837 to 14,428, while in other years the numbers remained dropped and stopped at 13,819 in 2008. The USA, the second most popular country, followed similarly by having a decrease from 4,167 to 4,003 during the period.
Overall, the table indicates that Spain and USA is generally the most popular destination for UK citizens. However, the popularity of Poland will likely to increase in the future.
- The table below shows the results of a survey to find out what members of a city sports club think about the club s activities facilities and opening hours Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make any comparisons whe 72
- The table below shows UK residents visits abroad by country of visit from 2004 to 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 57
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, similarly, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1104.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90666666667 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38155877992 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551111111111 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3066152193 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.4 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143554464598 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661358679387 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657526996232 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0996957747527 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679089575297 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.