The graph below shows the percentage change in place where students lived over five decade.
The percentage of students living in four different places is presented in the bar chart from 1960s to 2000s.
Obviously, the percentage of student living in a shared house rose, while those with guest, in the residence hall and house decreased. Most students prefered to live in a shared house.
Initially, students living in a shared-house stood at 35%, making to the same with those in a host family, and students living in residence hall had the similar percentage with own family at 15% . By 2000s, a significant increase had been seen in shared-house's trend, reaching the highest percentage at 70%, leaving widened gap among others. However, the percentage of students living in residence hall had been showed as a slight decrease as with own family of around 3%.
In 1970s, the figure for a shared house rose to 40% before this reached a peak at around twofold, coming first in each year, while those for living in residence hall were recorded at 20%, then those fluctuated to around 13%. The percentage of students living with guest fell dramatically at almost sixfold, and those with house own family showed a significant decrease 10% before those leveled off to 5%, hitting a low in the end of the year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-05 | hannah14032002 | 27 | view |
| 2023-01-05 | hannah14032002 | 11 | view |
| 2022-09-15 | trachanhkhongmat | 82 | view |
| 2022-09-15 | trachanhkhongmat | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-15 | trachanhkhongmat | 73 | view |
- the diagram shows about the visual appearant motion 71
- The criminal record in Cape town 78
- the percentage of population by race 84
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 78
- The lifecyle of salmon by estuary
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...imilar percentage with own family at 15% . By 2000s, a significant increase had be...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'In the 1970s'.
Suggestion: In the 1970s
...ase as with own family of around 3%. In 1970s, the figure for a shared house rose to ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1014.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.875 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62501137847 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509615384615 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5133711371 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.75 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192729789042 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119344971016 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585391727931 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151871221286 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422663117556 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.