The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days.
The bar chart represents the percentage of people visited movie theaters in single European nation throughout the week for year 2003,2005,2007.
Overall, the most percentage of peoples visited theaters on Saturday and Sunday. However on Friday's the numbers are same for all years. In rest of the days count is heavily fluctuated except for Wednesday where it followed drop in numbers.
Firstly, At 2005 it reaches the most significant values of 45% on Saturday, while it reaches 33% in Sunday in same year. Secondly, on Fridays 30% of people watched cinemas for all year. For mid day, the numbers are getting declined for every two years and reaches the least significant of 8% at 2007.
Despite considering the weekdays the numbers are fluctuated heavily for every year. Instance, On Thursday it was at 18% in 2003 after a year it slightly reduced to 12% in 2005 and again suddenly inclined to 19% in 2007. During Mondays 10% peoples visited in 2003 after it jumped to 13% and again it went down to 13% in 2007.
- The charts show information concerning speed camera use together with statistics on road accidents for the city of Melbourne 75
- The charts show information concerning speed-camera use, together with statistics on road accidents, for the city of Melbourne.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The chart shows the amount of fast foods consumption in Melbourne over period of time. 56
- Buying things on the Internet, such as books, air tickets and groceries, is becoming more and more popular.Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own kn 89
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 407, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...then it reduced to 17% after two years. Finally the percentage again rise and then it r...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, then, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06796116505 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65854601342 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519417475728 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.2277352167 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.3076923077 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8461538462 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0870743924666 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0370107163198 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037625479627 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0706871790957 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031643248389 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.