The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.

The line graph illustrates the concentrations of two air pollutants in London in the time span between 1600 and 2000. Units are measured in micrograms per cubic metre.

Overall, the two chemicals present a similar trend but SO2 had remained the most concentrated in air over all the years.

Just before 1600 when the industrial revolution had not yet started, pollution levels of the two chemicals were both low (around 0) and close to each other so that we can assume a common starting point. However, between 1600 and the following two hundred and seventy years, the pollutants saw a different growth in levels since the trend of sulphur dioxide, as the graph shows, is far steeper than that of smoke in this period of time. In fact, just in 1670 SO2 had a concentration of nearly 625 and smoke of only 240. The situation continued to be more or less the same except some rigid variations of sulphur dioxide which reached peaks at approximately 750 in 1725 and 875 by 1840.

In 1870, smoke and SO2 had reached their maximum at almost 475 and 875 respectively. After that, they began to decline rapidly with evident fluctuations between 1925 and 1970. The final picture is a return to their initial values near to zero in modern times (2000 year).

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 419, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... far steeper than that of smoke in this period of time. In fact, just in 1670 SO2 had a concen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, in fact, more or less

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72602739726 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56987177613 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657534246575 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0323541201 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227208846586 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806349522373 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120901891212 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132713675555 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117242516134 0.0819641961636 143% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.