The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given line graph information on two country India and China growth of population explain past and forecast the population.

The United Nations population division on only two major countries across the highest crowd folks in world. In 2000 years India human are touched in 1000 billions and China approximately reached 1250 billions . Than after Indian population dramaticially increase and China growth is minor variation , but both birth and death ratio intersect point on 2030 years around development same 1450 billions than after future may be India population soar and China growth is second number of world pollution. In 2050 years Indian growth 1600 billions and chines population decrease in 150 billions over 50 years.

To conclude, beginning Indian life quality is poor compared to chine life quality over pass the decades chine life quality is mediator change and Indian continuous improvement better quality life in future.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...hina approximately reached 1250 billions . Than after Indian population dramaticia...
^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: SENT_START_THEM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Then'?
Suggestion: Then
...a approximately reached 1250 billions . Than after Indian population dramaticially i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ease and China growth is minor variation , but both birth and death ratio intersec...
^^
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'decades'' or 'decade's'?
Suggestion: decades'; decade's
...red to chine life quality over pass the decades chine life quality is mediator change a...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...tinuous improvement better quality life in future.
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, second, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 798.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 147.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42857142857 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48200454523 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56644505911 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639455782313 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.7776229652 43.030603864 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20559909612 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112689990178 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069755701115 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140071145347 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0991342369123 0.0819641961636 121% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.