The graph below shows population variation in three wildlife species from 2011 to 2016 in North America and its coastal areas.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided line graph demonstrates the population of bears, dolphins, and whales over the course of six years, commencing in 2011, while the pie chart indicates the expenditure which is apportioned for safeguarding three distinct species.
A first glance at the line chart reveals that while dolphins experienced a significant deceleration, other counterparts namely bears, and whales registered an inverse trend during the surveyed period. Additionally, it is apparent that the quantity of mentioned species is proportional to the allocated budget.
As is shown in the line chart, it is manifest that bears, holding the smallest share in the beginning, started to skyrocket continuously to around 100 thousand in 2013 and reached its peak at approximately 180 thousand in the end of the surveyed course. However, starting at exactly 150 thousand, the number of dolphins dramatically plummeted to nearly zero after six years. Moreover, whales underwent a fluctuation during the period and shrank by 10 thousand compared to the year 2011.
Turning to the other features, owing to the highest population, the largest expenditure, which accounted for two-third of the total, was allocated to bears for preserving purposes. Whales and dolphins hold the smaller share, 30%, and 5% respectively.
- Children engaged in paid work 73
- The chart below shows three different types of crime in England and Wales from 1970 to 2005 46
- School and university students learn lessons far better from their teachers than from other sources such as the Internet or television To what extent you agree or disagree 89
- When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The charts below show the number of working hours per week in industrial sector in four European countries in 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons with relevant 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1096.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50753768844 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07824938927 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628140703518 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.2800077039 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0499412040794 0.215688989381 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0211920805463 0.103423049105 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.027587333488 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0317457247504 0.15604864568 20% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316424967863 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.06136585366 125% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.