School and university students learn lessons far better from their teachers than from other sources such as the Internet or television. To what extent you agree or disagree?
There is an opinion that the optimum method to gain high scholastic achievements is to have an academic trainer comparing to other media such as via the Internet or television. From my perspective, much as indispensable instructors are, I strongly contend that the quintessential advent of technology should not be underestimated.
On the one side of this issue, teachers have been undoubtedly acted as a deterrent in terms of providing guidance to students. To embark on, peripatetic teachers are condemned as people with certain expertise and reliable knowledge in order to give direct instructions as well as appropriate ones. Therefore, there is no medium, more often than not, that could ensure the creditable sources of knowledge but only professors. In addition to this, with regard to primary students who are likely to do not even have elementary technological skills, teachers hold a much more imperative role than whenever.
On the other hand, albeit the merits of having a professional instructor, other sources such as the Internet, smartphones, televisions, among others are also pivotal factors. As a matter of fact, students ranging from undergraduates and postgraduates ones tend to get access to the Internet successively as it has been supplied them with a great deal of informative data. Not only do they use the Internet for doing school assignment purposes, but they also access these online-based for self-taught. Take this social distance period as valid evidence, during the Covid-19 epidemic, the multitudes have to work from home and via online platform without physically interpersonal interaction so that the remaining aspect of society will not be delayed.
In conclusion, in spite of appreciating the beneficial elements of having a teacher, I would be of opinion that technology should be also accompanied to have the best efficacious studying method.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-17 | Cowy | 89 | view |
| 2020-02-29 | clarkkent159 | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the spending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countries between 1975 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows population variation in three wildlife species from 2011 to 2016 in North America and its coastal areas Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn 61
- The line graph below provide information about the incomes of four restaurants in a city in 2010 84
- Some people think that in the modern world we are more dependent on each other while others think that people have become more independent 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, as well as, in spite of, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41554054054 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20037655005 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628378378378 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.1205715423 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.727272727 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9090909091 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4545454545 7.06120827912 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174497707856 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607369428076 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366567155379 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905681473388 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490341014083 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.